What does FIND stand for in problem solving?

What does FIND stand for in problem solving?

• A. Find the problem, identify possibilities, assess pro and con, decide and act
• B. Figure out the problem and answer it quickly
• C. Figure out the problem, identify possible solutions, name the pros and cons for each solution, decide on which solution is the best then act on it
• D. Find the problem, identify options, evaluate, decide

Answer: (C)

In problem solving, a disciplined approach means not just recognizing there is a problem, but systematically exploring options and weighing them before acting. The statement that best fits this approach lays out the full sequence: figure out the problem, identify possible solutions, name the pros and cons for each solution, decide on which solution is the best then act on it. This structure matters because it moves beyond a quick guess and ensures every viable path is considered and compared on concrete criteria. Why this is the best is that it explicitly requires listing the pros and cons for each potential solution, so choices are evaluated on tangible advantages and trade-offs rather than intuition alone. It also completes the loop by including a clear decision and the subsequent action, which is essential to actually solving the problem rather than just thinking about it. The other statements fall short because they either skip the detailed evaluation of each option or jump to action too quickly without a thorough comparison. They may identify problems or options, but they don’t require weighing them in a structured way or completing an implementation step.

In problem solving, a disciplined approach means not just recognizing there is a problem, but systematically exploring options and weighing them before acting. The statement that best fits this approach lays out the full sequence: figure out the problem, identify possible solutions, name the pros and cons for each solution, decide on which solution is the best then act on it. This structure matters because it moves beyond a quick guess and ensures every viable path is considered and compared on concrete criteria.

Why this is the best is that it explicitly requires listing the pros and cons for each potential solution, so choices are evaluated on tangible advantages and trade-offs rather than intuition alone. It also completes the loop by including a clear decision and the subsequent action, which is essential to actually solving the problem rather than just thinking about it.

The other statements fall short because they either skip the detailed evaluation of each option or jump to action too quickly without a thorough comparison. They may identify problems or options, but they don’t require weighing them in a structured way or completing an implementation step.